Revision Difference

Wheat (1) - Part 1

Image 98

Revision as of 08:23:58, Jun 15, 2017
Edited by 101.0.82.75
Revision as of 02:19:33, Jun 16, 2017
Edited by 101.0.82.75
Line 9: Line 9:
 
2278.  You would not complain that the Government were neglectful in supplying dunnage under such conditions?▬ I do not know the cases to which you are alluding.  The position might be clear to you because you have taken a lot of evidence on it, but it is not clear to me.
 
2278.  You would not complain that the Government were neglectful in supplying dunnage under such conditions?▬ I do not know the cases to which you are alluding.  The position might be clear to you because you have taken a lot of evidence on it, but it is not clear to me.
 
2279.  You said it was regrettable that the Government sent inspectors in addition to the inspectors sent by the Westralian Farmers, and that those inspectors were not required.  How do you make out that the Pool inspectors were not required?▬ I meant to convey the fact that there is no need for two inspectors in connection with the one line of action.  The inspector of the Westralian Farmers inspect for the purpose of seeing tha the  sub-agent is carrying out the terms of the contract.
 
2279.  You said it was regrettable that the Government sent inspectors in addition to the inspectors sent by the Westralian Farmers, and that those inspectors were not required.  How do you make out that the Pool inspectors were not required?▬ I meant to convey the fact that there is no need for two inspectors in connection with the one line of action.  The inspector of the Westralian Farmers inspect for the purpose of seeing tha the  sub-agent is carrying out the terms of the contract.
2280.  And the Government or Pool inspector
+
2280.  And the Government or Pool inspector is appointed to see that the Westralian Farmers, Ltd., are adhering to their contract?▬Yes.
 +
2281.  Therefore, if the Pool did not have the Westralian Farmers, Ltd., as middlemen, the one inspector would have done for both?▬

Revision as of 02:19:33, Jun 16, 2017

2270. Do you not think there is more likelihood of delay occurring when a branch society has to communicate with someone else, say an acquiring agent, and then that agent has to apply to the Government before definite instruction can be given?▬ There should not be the necessity for all that. 2271. You think then that the branch society should communicate direct with the Pool?▬ Not in the way you suggest. We receive all our instructions from the acquiring agents. 2272. Suppose the agent wanted dunnage, he would have to write to the Westralian Farmers and the Westralian Farmers would have to write to the Pool. Do you not think you would be able to get quicker attention by writing direct to the Pool?▬ Not by my experience of any Government institution. 2273. But this is not a Government institution?▬ It is controlled, which means red-tape. 2274. This Scheme is controlled by a manager. Therefore, so far as dunnage is concerned or anything else, the Westralian Farmers might require, the manager of the Pool and no the Minister would be communicated with?▬ I suppose that is right, but in cases of that kind the Westralian Farmers would get an accurate list of every bit of dunnage at every siding in Western Australia, and they would also find out where they could lay their hand on every sheet of iron and everything in the form of covering. 2275. But if your society wanted dunnage?▬ They would not write to the Government to forward it. 2276. Would you be surprised to know that complaints were made by the Westralian Farmers, Ltd., in regard to supplying sleepers for dunnage and owing to some neglect they said they had to take it themselves?▬ I would not be surprised at anything that happened in connection with the Government department. 2277. Would you be surprised to know that the sleepers were sent in a considerable time before they were required for use?▬ That would not surprise me because it would be a natural thing to happen. If a wheat-receiving agent requires sleepers a month ahead, he should do his best to get them. In such a case he would have them for some time before he had the need or the opportunity to use them. 2278. You would not complain that the Government were neglectful in supplying dunnage under such conditions?▬ I do not know the cases to which you are alluding. The position might be clear to you because you have taken a lot of evidence on it, but it is not clear to me. 2279. You said it was regrettable that the Government sent inspectors in addition to the inspectors sent by the Westralian Farmers, and that those inspectors were not required. How do you make out that the Pool inspectors were not required?▬ I meant to convey the fact that there is no need for two inspectors in connection with the one line of action. The inspector of the Westralian Farmers inspect for the purpose of seeing tha the sub-agent is carrying out the terms of the contract. 2280. And the Government or Pool inspector is appointed to see that the Westralian Farmers, Ltd., are adhering to their contract?▬Yes. 2281. Therefore, if the Pool did not have the Westralian Farmers, Ltd., as middlemen, the one inspector would have done for both?▬